Positive and normative statements
A positive statement describes or predicts and can, in principle, be checked against data: "A rise in bus fares reduced passenger numbers by 6%." It may be false, but it is testable. A normative statement contains a value judgement about what ought to happen: "The city should keep fares low for students." Words like should, fair, too high and better usually signal normative content. Policy debates mix both: evidence tells us what a policy is likely to do, values decide whether those outcomes are desirable.
Models, assumptions and ceteris paribus
The real economy has millions of interacting decisions, so economists build models: simplified representations that isolate a few variables. The demand and supply diagram, the PPC and the circular flow are all models. Models depend on assumptions, for example that consumers aim to maximise satisfaction or that firms aim to maximise profit. The key assumption is ceteris paribus: all other things held constant, so the effect of one variable can be studied alone.
A good model is judged by how useful its predictions are, not by how realistic every assumption is. Still, when assumptions are badly wrong, predictions fail, which is why later topics (behavioural economics in 2.4) challenge some of them.
The scientific method in economics
Economists form a hypothesis ("higher minimum wages reduce youth employment"), use logic to derive predictions, then test them with empirical evidence such as statistics or natural experiments. Unlike chemists, they rarely run controlled experiments on whole economies, so it is hard to separate cause from correlation. Evidence can support a theory but never prove it beyond doubt, and results may differ between countries and time periods.
Value judgements and equity
Equity means fairness, which is different from equality (everyone having the same). Whether a distribution of income is equitable is a normative question. Economists can measure inequality, but deciding how much is acceptable depends on values.
How economic thinking has changed
- Classical thought (late 1700s onwards) stressed that markets guided by self-interest and competition could allocate resources well, with limited government.
- Marxist critiques argued that markets concentrate wealth and exploit labour.
- Neoclassical economics added marginal analysis and rational, maximising agents, the basis of most diagrams in this course.
- Keynesian economics, after the Great Depression, argued that markets may not fix mass unemployment alone, so government spending matters.
- Monetarist and new classical thinking in the 1970s-80s put more trust in markets and focused on controlling inflation.
- Behavioural economics draws on psychology to show that people make systematic errors.
- Circular economy thinking replaces the linear "take, make, dispose" model with one where products are designed to be reused, repaired and recycled, keeping materials in use and cutting waste.
Common mistakes
- Thinking a positive statement must be true. It only needs to be testable.
- Labelling any statement with numbers as positive. "Taxes of 40% are too high" is normative despite the number.
- Treating ceteris paribus as realism. It is a deliberate simplification.
- Confusing equity with equality.
Exam tips
- 10-mark questions: explain why models simplify, give a concrete model from the course and show how ceteris paribus lets you isolate a cause.
- 15-mark questions: evaluate the usefulness of models built on rational-agent assumptions. Credit their clarity and predictive power, then use behavioural evidence and real-world complexity as limits, and reach a judgement.
- When asked to distinguish statements from an extract, quote the words that make each one positive or normative.